Beginner models are meant for those who are just getting into photography and do not want to spend an arm and a leg to get started. Don’t worry, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, as all beginner models today are excellent.
If you decide to shop online, please consider clicking on my Amazon, Adorama or B&H links and then buying the camera or whatever you had in mind. It helps the blog because I receive a small commission and you don’t pay a single cent more!
You can go back to Buying a DSLR Camera if you are still confused.
Canon EOS 1000D/Rebel XS
- 10 Megapixels
- ISO 100-1600
- No Video
- 3 frames per second
- 2.5″ LCD Monitor – 230k – Live View
- 7 Auto Focus Points
- Announced in 2008
The oldest camera in this buying section! Since it was released back in 2008, you can not really expect it to have all the bells and whistles that we have in cameras today. Is the Canon EOS 1000D/Rebel XS still any good? Of course, why wouldn’t it be? If you buy a new model, it will work perfectly!
It has a 10 megapixel CMOS sensor, maximum ISO speed of 1600, 2.5″ LCD screen with Live View and that is pretty much it. Price is extremely low too, so if you want to start your photography adventure this could be the model!
Buy: Canon EOS XS From Amazon | Adorama
Nikon D3000
- 10 Megapixels
- ISO 100-3200
- No Video
- 3 frames per second
- 3.0″ LCD Monitor – 230k
- 11 Auto Focus Points
- Announced in 2009
You are looking at the main rival of the Canon EOS 1000D! Is it better? Worse? To be honest, they are almost identical. Yes, it does have 2 more auto focus points and one stop higher maximum ISO speed, but that’s it. However, if for some reason you can’t live without Live View, this is not the model you should buy. But come on, viewfinders are the best, look through them (unless you are doing night photography).
Buy: Nikon D3000 From Amazon | Adorama | B&H
Nikon D3100
- 14 Megapixels
- ISO 100-12800
- Full HD [24fps] and HD [30/25/24fps]
- 3 frames per second
- 3.0″ LCD Monitor – 230k – Live View
- 11 Auto Focus Points
- Announced in 2010
Nikon D3100 replaces the model above, a very popular camera that faced some serious competition from other companies. With a brand new, 14 megapixel sensor and ISO that goes up to 12800, D3100 is a camera that you can use for pretty much everything. A few years ago, professional models had horrible noise performance at ISO 1600, whereas this little camera is still good at 6400!
Another important thing you must know is Full HD and HD video recording with Full Time Auto Focus while recording – fastest so far. Other useful features are 3 frames per second, 11 AF points and Live View in a light, small body. It is relatively cheap as well, and I have to say it is the best price/performance model out right now.
Highly recommended from me! Nikon D3100 prooves that beginner cameras can be amazing and cheap!
Buy: Nikon D3100 From Amazon | Adorama | B&H
Canon EOS 1100D/Rebel T3
- 12 Megapixels
- ISO 100-6400
- HD [25/30fps]
- 3 frames per second
- 2.7″ LCD Monitor – 230k – Live View
- 9 Auto Focus Points
- Announced in 2011
It took Canon 3 years to update their lowest model! Even the highest professional cameras don’t get such treatment. What does the 36 months newer T3 get? New CMOS sensor with 2 more megapixels, increased ISO speed up to 6400 (with great low light performance), HD video but no manual controls, redesigned body and buttons, 2 more auto focus points (9, same focusing system like in the T3i) and a few other nice little improvements.
I think Canon should have announced a 1000D/XS upgrade out sooner, because the Nikon D3100 is hard (next to impossible) to beat. But the Rebel is around $50 cheaper if you are on a tight budget.
Buy: Canon EOS T3 From Amazon | Adorama | B&H
09/10/2011 at 4:12 PM
Hey, im a beginner. im currently working on a portfolio for art college and i want to invest in a good beginner camera. ive been recommended the Nikon D3100 and the Cannon 1100D. for some reason ive grown to fancy the Nikon, do think one is beter than the other?
09/11/2011 at 6:50 AM
Hey,
First, none of these two brands have better colors, crisper shots or anything like that. If somebody tells you so, they don’t have a clue about photography. DSLR cameras today are so similar, especially when it comes to image quality, because the final result will mostly depend on you. Some just expect that once you have a big expensive camera, all of your shots are great
The D3100 has 2 more megapixels, same quality, higher max ISO, less noise, better AF in video with manual controls. I’d definitely go with the D3100, it’s the best bang for your buck right now!
05/15/2012 at 8:13 PM
I know this thread is a bit old… but for those of you considering the same question…
Something to consider is that your lenses will last you through many camera bodies.
I’m a Canon guy and have been for years. I bought a T3i because my primary purpose was the video functionality. The still photos for me were a very nice bonus.
I’ve heard other people say the Nikon is better for stills. I don’t honestly know myself having never used one.
The good news is they’re both great brands. Simply stepping up to the plate and buying a DSLR will open up a whole world of photographic possibility.
10/06/2011 at 4:40 AM
Hey Chio,
I’m currently looking at buying a camera. I am either going to buy a Canon 1100D or the Nikon D3100. I am leaning towards the Nikon, but the thing that is holding me back is the no AF motor. I know you can purchase the lenses though with the AF in them. So i guess my question is is it that much of a big deal that the Nikon has no AF motor in it and is it hard to buy lenses to counter this?
My friend has a Canon and he is telling me to get the 1100D purely because the Nikon has no AF motor in it, and apart from that he says they are both similar.
I will be wanting to do macro, nature (animals, flowers, buildings etc) and people (portrait) photography.
I just can’t make up my mind as to which one to buy and am just after some clarification about the AF motor deal.
Thanks.
10/06/2011 at 8:25 AM
Hi,
Both cameras are indeed almost the same thing. The lack AF motor in Nikon will not be annoying, but since you said you’ll want to do lots of different types of photography = more lenses = as cheap as possible, you might want to consider buying the 1100D. Sure there are many lenses that will AF on the Nikon, but there are also many cheaper ones that will only work on their higher models (D90+). With the 1100D this is something you don’t have to worry about because all Canon EF and EF-S lenses will work with it.
The D3100 basically has Full HD video and allows you to manually control it while recording. It also has a little bit better ISO performance.
Btw, do you have any budget set for the lenses? Because the D3100 is still great and you could still get through this perfectly. Take a look at my Buying a Lens guide and continue to Nikon section. Compare the prices of the lenses you are interested int!
Good luck.
06/14/2012 at 11:01 AM
Hey m thinking to buy my frst dslr my budget is near 700$ only so plz tell me a good one !! i have heard D3200 is out now so in my budget D3200 fitz!! so shuld i go for that!!
thanks:D plz tell me and mail me itz **********
06/15/2012 at 7:28 AM
Hey,
First, don’t post mails online especially not on blogs, you’ll get a ton of spam from bots
The D3200 is quite good I still prefer the D3100 and T2i over it. It has 10 more megapixels, 1 more fps and costs $699 compared to D3100′s $549. You could almost get a 50mm f/1.8G for that money!
11/18/2011 at 12:18 PM
Hi,
I am currently hunting down my first DSLR ever & I’m stuck inbetween to cameras: Nikon d3100 & the Canon 1100d. It’s important to me to have live view & a viewfinder because I want to start out with live view because it will bring some familiarity while I’m learning to use it & when I know how to use it without difficulty, I’ll use the viewfinder. Now I do have a budget. It has to be less than $600. I do want a wide selection of lens since I’ll be using this one for a few years. Also I’m going to be stuck with the lens it brings for a while (18-55mm) & was wondering which offers the better lens. I really dont have a need for the movie mode so that’s not a priority. Nikon has a bit more megapixels but I doubt I need to worry about that. I will shoot indoor & outdoor shots; nothing specifically. A lot of types of photography aswell (macro, still life, nature, urban, etc). Which do you recommend for me?
11/18/2011 at 2:39 PM
Hey,
I personally recommend the D3100 to anyone who has enough money, over the 1100D. Why? Because for $550 (Amazon), you get one stop higher maximum ISO with less noise overall. That’s great for low light. Then there are 2 more auto focus points and a slightly larger LCD screen, plus better video mode. 2 more megapixels don’t make any differences indeed. Both 18-55mm kit lenses are optically the same, not the best out there but great to start learning and to see what kind of lenses you will need in the future. Basically your camera can shoot everything with any lens, except for macro where a macro lens is recommended to get that great close up “effect”.
The 1100D ain’t bad, but when you got something out for a bit more that performs better… Both have the same quality, sharpness etc., it’s similar on all DSLR models.
So get the D3100 + 18-55mm and start learning. Then upgrade to something that you need, like a 35mm or 50mm f/1.8G, 55-300mm, 10-24mm, depending on your needs.
11/20/2011 at 10:18 PM
Hi
I am thinking in buying one Nikon, just in doubt if going to D3000 and D3100. As a begginner I don’t know if I will use the 3 or 4 different points. Another question, I have a F90X with some lens (AF Nikkor 75-70mm and 35-80mm) do they fit in this new models?
Thanks
11/21/2011 at 12:05 PM
Hey,
Are you talking about the auto focus points? Trust me, more points can never hurt, and 11 of them on the D3100 are great. D3100 has improved high ISO performance, video, live view and that would be it. I prefer the XS over D3000, but since you have two Nikon lenses it would be the best to get a Nikon DSLR.
However, as these beginner models don’t have a built-in AF motor, none of older Nikon lenses will auto focus on them. They will fit of course, but only manual focus is available.
If you have enough money for the D3100 I think you should go with it. It’s really the best price/performance camera available today.
11/21/2011 at 1:28 PM
Hi
I see your point. I also check the detail of the live view and that is really important to me. I was wandering about Canon as well after a good experience with a old G4, but the other Nikon lens make it more handy “££” for now.
Which sit you recommend online with good price/service?
Cheers
11/21/2011 at 2:54 PM
Hey,
Yeah, Canon has a T3 but the Nikon D3100 gives you more, and then there’s a T2i for a higher price, but 99% the same thing. Even manual focusing lenses can often be handy!
I’m an affiliate for Amazon, including UK, because I recommend them for almost everything. There are Amazon UK links in this guide below every camera, and that’s how you can support the site if you’re interested (same price). Unfortunately I don’t know any other UK sites, only for US.
Good luck!
11/21/2011 at 6:33 PM
Hey
Wondering if you can help me? im sort of in the same position as Grainne. Im stuck between the nikon d3100 and the canon eos 1100D. Tried out both in the shop and they both felt great in my hands, had no problems but i did find the canon was easier to use than the nikon. I have a budget of around £300-£470 ish because this will be my first DSLR and a big jump from a digital camera. Theres a deal on at the moment for the canon at £479 for the camera, a bag, 18-55mm lens, 70-200mm lens and uv filter, whereas the nikon with just one 18-55mm lens is £470. When i held the canon and saw it for myself i can see where the reviews are coming from becuase it looks cheap and plasticy to be honest. Features wise the nikon is better with 14mp, effects such as miniature effect and self sensor dust cleaning, all of these the 1100D dosnt have. But the problem is the price, I know that my parents are worried about all this being a fad and that i will go off photography and id feel really guilty them spending hundreds of pounds on the nikon so im not sure whats best?
Thanks!
11/21/2011 at 8:01 PM
Hey,
I don’t think there’s a 70-200mm in the pack, the cheapest 70-200mm alone is more than the 1100D. Are you sure it wasn’t a 55-250mm, or 70-300mm?
Yes, the 1100D feels more plasticy and cheap, but the D3100 ain’t made out of magnesium either
I wish I could help you on the “fad” problem, but it’s something you’ll need to work on your own. How long have you been taking pictures for? What is it that caught your attention about these cameras, and how often do you photograph?
I’d go with the D3100, better high ISO performance, better video and better AF are things I’d pay more for. Good luck, I hope you sort it out.
11/21/2011 at 8:26 PM
Yeah I just checked, my mistake it is a 70-300mm not 200mm lens in the pack. Seriously I have been into photography for about a year now after I tried out my friends pentax dslr. I was told about bridge cameras and that I should get one of them first so for a while i was considering the panasonic lumix dmc fz45 but looked around and grew on DSLRs and found the D5100 and 1100D. I went to a concert about a year ago and would have loved a better camera to get better pictures obviously, and rcently ive found my self thinking alot in situations where i see things, for example when the sun catches a scene just right and i think, if i had a good camera that would look awseome. I photograph ALOT! everywhere I go if theres something intersting i’ll get it as best as i can with the camera that i have but theres only so much you can do with a digital camera.
Thanks for all the help!
11/21/2011 at 8:53 PM
Well the 75-300mm is a horrible lens. The only good one is the 70-300mm IS USM version for $500, while the $150 75-300mm is the worst telephoto from Canon ever made, you’d be wasting that extra money.
Indeed, concerts can and will look better, but you need to understand a DSLR camera requires reading and practicing, which shouldn’t be hard with the internet and some basic knowledge.
The D3100 will be a perfect DSLR, good luck! Don’t forget to be happy that your parents are getting you the camera, many don’t get the chance (but its clear you respect it very much already)
.
11/24/2011 at 4:39 PM
hi,I doubt both these dslrs has a flash-lag ..lol..i mean slow flash that may result eyes closed when flash is ON.Is it so ?I take yor words and trying to go for D3100.I guess its better than P & S digi cam that i have (Sony DSC-w210)
11/24/2011 at 5:35 PM
Which ones? The D3100 and..1100D/T3? I don’t fully understand what you mean with flash lag. Its the shutter speed that causes blur, the flash just freezes the scene. You can control all the settings on DSLR cameras, that’s the point of them.
D3100 is an amazing camera, but all DSLRs have the same image quality.
11/25/2011 at 9:00 AM
Canon 550D and Nikon D3100? which one is better in image quality,low light performance! I heard that 550D’s disadvantage is that in night when flash is on , it causes the eye blink/closed of the person in the picture. thats why i turned towards D3100..flash freezes the scene? i dono t understand that
11/25/2011 at 11:28 AM
You heard wrong about the 550D. No DSLR just makes eyes to look closed, that’s simply the reaction from people to a sudden flash.
A flash is a very quick beam of light, used to either get more avaiable light or to freeze the moment. It’s nothing hard to understand once you buy a DSLR and practice
I can’t just say which one is better in image quality, there is no formula. All DSLRs today have the same quality, colors etc. The 550D and D3100 have identical high ISO performance (great on both). The D3100 has no AF motor built in so not all lenses will focus, and it doesn’t have 60fps in HD video. On the other hand, it has 2 more auto focus points.
I’d get the T2i and a 18-135mm (to your second comment). Everything is available in Asia, just look at some popular stores. Unfortunately the 18-135mm has closest focusing distance a little bit higher than 1 foot, but it’s still a great lens.
11/25/2011 at 2:11 PM
Thank you Chio-TDP,that was really convincing.No AF motor means focus to be made manually, right!If my budget fits I am thinking of going to Nik D5100 otherwise Canon 550D is the decisive property for me !
11/25/2011 at 3:51 PM
The D5100 doesn’t have an AF motor indeed, but many lenses will fully work with it. It’s all said in my Buying a Lens Guide. All Nikon lenses with AF-S will work, and there are plenty of them.
550D is a great model too, it’s the same thing as the 600D which competes with D5100, without an articulating screen. Whatever is easier for your budget and will allow you to buy any more lenses!
11/25/2011 at 4:05 PM
if u have to choose among 550D and D5100 which will you choose? if possible , reason….. Chio !!!be precise please do not go round and round, i know its injustice to one of the league leaders but I know u r the expert in this field and I want to invest now for a longer time..my budget will not allow me to see another model for many years i guess …
!!
11/25/2011 at 8:20 PM
Personally, I would go with the 550D. See the 600D is almost the same as D5100 when it comes to quality and noise performance, and since the 550D uses the 600D’s sensor then they are all the same. That’s why the 550D would be the best! And you said you won’t be able to upgrade for many years, so you’d spend money on lenses.
Good luck! 550D is a great camera!
11/26/2011 at 5:13 AM
thank you Chio ! I keep that in mind…tomorrow is the day, buying 550D ! yippyyyy….thinking of also 50mm F1.8 or 50mm f1.4 …i ‘ve gone thru your lens guide…it was compelling…i want to know if there’s I.S. system on both…i think the F1.4 is expensive right!!i’m thinking of wide or macro lens but not tele or zoom lens becoz there’s nothing to shoot in tele scope or zoomed focus in the place where i live in…but i do believe that zoomed focus to even a portrait helps to acquire best concept of photography..isn’t so !!!!
11/26/2011 at 9:40 AM
Great! Well the 50mm 1.4 has many advantages, including better quality, focusing speed and accuracy. I think you should go with it instead of the f/1.8 and then later buy a new lens when you figure out what you need.
11/27/2011 at 5:29 PM
Hi! I have been using a point and shoot for several years now and feel it’s overdue the time I should upgrade to a DSLR. The models that fit with my budget and look like they’d suit my needs right now are Nikon D3100, D5000 and canon T2i. I was hoping you could compare these models for me!
Thankyou!
11/27/2011 at 6:54 PM
Hey,
I’d skip the D5000, D3100 would be much better. Compared to the T2i, it has 2 more auto focus points, less megapixels, same high ISO performance, better auto focus in video but no built-in AF motor so not all lenses will auto focus with it. The T2i offers 60fps in HD video and is also built a little bit better. Basically, if you think 60fps could be useful to you, get the T2i, otherwise the D3100 will be just fine. If you’re from the USA, check out my latest post (Black Friday deals) where prices are much lower from official stores like Amazon etc.
You won’t go wrong with any of these two, so don’t worry. Quality of images, sharpness etc. – it’s the same on almost all DSLR cameras.
11/29/2011 at 3:08 PM
Hi Chio,I just bought Canon 550D.IT is AAAWWWWWSSSSOOOOMMMEEEEEE!!!!!….totally in love and fantasy….i bought a tripod too..becoz i was so disappointed with my shaking fingers and palm … idk why am i nervous with my own new 550D …like talking to new girl next door…LOL..:)..i am a happy guy.thanks CHIO…i loved Tamron 18-250mm IS lens but cost lil bit heavy….speedlite too..i auctioned that for later years …sooooop i’d like to say all those beginners also amatuers also semi-pro to connect with this site…CHIO is very helpful…and i’m stuck with his pages…gotta go !!! adeos ameegos!!!
11/29/2011 at 4:02 PM
Hey,
You do indeed seem like you love the camera
Don’t be nervous, it’s a tool that will perform great when you understand how to use it. All the info can be found in the manual (but don’t read it for too long it gets boring), on the internet and with practicing. I personally don’t recommend you to buy the Tamron 18-250mm as it isn’t optically great, but when you’ll be buying a new lens you will know what you need. Thanks for the kind words, and good luck!
11/30/2011 at 3:15 AM
1 more thing(since i’m not reading manuals), the vdo shooting autom. stops when zooming…why is that????..(this is not a COMPLAIN !!!LOL)
11/30/2011 at 8:58 AM
Are you sure it stops when you zoom, or does it happen randomly? If so, your card might be too full, try formatting your card after you put all the shots on your computer so nothing will be lost. And please tell me which card you are using.
11/30/2011 at 3:45 PM
memory card that i’m using “(SP Silicon Power)SDHC 8gb” and today i bought “Scadisk SDHC memory card 4gb” ; I donot know if they r genuine ,the first one is given by the canon retailer”..i think the card is still empty upto 3-4 gb but stops when zooming vdo recording..how much space does it need to record the movie?
11/30/2011 at 4:26 PM
Well I’ve heard that video stops randomly, but never only when it zooms..Please try formatting as I said, and look on the Sandisk card and tell me which Class is it. It’s probably 6 or 10.
11/30/2011 at 3:18 AM
hey Chio.. i want to show u some trial shots (jpeg) ..hope u’ll like ‘em !!
https://www.facebook.com/#!/media/set/?set=a.248074861920762.60696.248062651921983&type=3
11/30/2011 at 8:57 AM
I see you’re already doing fine. Did you shoot in Auto mode, or did you control anything manually? Sooner or later you will want to do at least something manually, like selecting the focus points, then the shutter speed etc. But those shots are good, you just make sure to keep on shooting!
11/30/2011 at 3:50 PM
i’m playing with that dial wheel…when i donot understand anything i switch to FULL AUTO otherwise i’m always on CA-Portrait-Tv-Av-Landscape-M mode..playing with all those setups..settings….!
11/30/2011 at 4:24 PM
The dial wheel in Manual mode will control the shutter speed. Hold the AV button on its left while rotating the wheel and you can change the aperture. There’s an ISO button on top if I’m correct, and it’s simple to control that one as well.
I recommend you to switch to Manual right now then head over to the shutter speed tutorial and try doing it for yourself to see how it affects your images.
12/01/2011 at 2:44 AM
what about a smallest wheel near Viewfinder..what’s its use?
12/01/2011 at 8:51 AM
It’s to change the view fro those who see harder, or wear glasses. Don’t rotate that wheel, but if your viewfinder appears blurry it means it has accidentally moved a bit.
12/01/2011 at 3:16 PM
Hello…have been reading your reviews and comments and first off I want to say Thanks soo much you have been extremely helpful! I went ahead and bought the D3100 last night…but to be honest I am a bit hesitant so I am going to run it by you to see what you would do!
I ended up buying the 55-300 lens instead of the 55-200 lens since it was only $100 more…but I could’ve bought the D5100 for $200 more. Would you have bought the D5100 or the 55-300 lens? Or I guess for $300 more bought the D5100 and the 55-300 lens? Money is important and it was a tough decision since I don’t want to “waste” it…but I was mainly leaning more towards the D5100 since it had double the amount of ISO 6500 vs 3200. I did like the swivel screen on the 5100 but I know 90% of the time I would keep it in the camera. The 2 extra MP’s didn’t matter. I mainly have issues with low light photos being grainy (in old “broken” point and shoot digital)…and I really want to avoid that. Video is also important to me…since I like to videotape the kids. Like my son playing hockey so he can see what he can improve on and to catch that goal. 
If only money wasn’t an issue…oh all the possibilities! 
12/01/2011 at 4:09 PM
Hey,
I would always prefer a new lens over a small upgrade body like the D5100. If you were talking about the D7000 then that would be more difficult. The extra ISO stop is helpful but D3100′s ISO performance is already great and is on par with Full Frame models a few years ago (FF = better and bigger sensors). Video will also be the same, and the articulating screen is useless since it doesn’t have quick and accurate video.
So stick with what you have, use the money wisely
Maybe some time later on a prime like the 50mm f/1.8G or something, you’ll see later what you need.
12/01/2011 at 11:44 PM
Thanks…I have been playing with it in areas of my house where I used to get “grainy” results…but no longer!
Yep, my next investment will be a prime lens or maybe an added flash.
Mainly just needed to hear that what I picked out would be alright!
12/01/2011 at 3:45 PM
LMAO..I thought that was for BOKEH effect..!!!or DOF!!
12/02/2011 at 2:50 PM
hey Chio, can u hint me,suggest any software or technique in Photoshop to watermark effectively..to impress more my friends..!!
12/02/2011 at 5:38 PM
Well there aren’t any techniques for that..just do something simple and easy to read, and make sure it’s not too visible (change the opacity to like 10-40% so it’s less distracting). I think your name with a good font would be enough, most people have it like that.
12/03/2011 at 3:05 AM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/386430_249676158427299_248062651921983_691767_52800486_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/377790_249662648428650_248062651921983_691755_918195857_n.jpg
12/03/2011 at 4:12 PM
Love the first shot! Btw, try to keep the watermark at the same position, like down right in the corner.
12/11/2011 at 3:36 PM
Chio,
Reading all of these posts has been so beneficial for me as I am just making the jump. I have a whole loyalty complex that I have with Nikon haha. Every camera I’ve ever used has been a Nikon. Now, I am looking to make the jump to the dslr and I am really keen on the d3100. My question for you is in your opinion, what is the best second (upgrade) LENS to purchase after getting the kit. Would an all purpose lens be the best way to go? Or is it better to get a telephoto lens for sports and distance photography and close up lens like a 50mm 1.8 or something for not distance shooting. I’m just curious as to if all-purpose glass is a sucker buy or not. Also, do you think it’s better to use a variety of Lens brands or just use the brand of your body. I just don’t know if there are better quality with other brands.
Lastly, being that I am into getting good glass, would there be any difference in going with a base T3 or T1i (Canon models) vs. the d3100 to save money and purchase better glass? I know there are a lot of features to the d3100 (and I would like to stay Nikon) I just would love some of your thoughts on the matter.
Thanks,
Ben
12/11/2011 at 4:18 PM
Hey,
Well it’s good that you want to stick with one brand, but as a beginner it’s usually better to consider all available options. However, the D3100 is an amazing camera, better than the T3 (but you need to pay more), and much better than the T1i in terms of noise, video and features for the price. You would actually have to compare it to the T2i as well, and they’re both almost the same.
Figuring out which lens to upgrade to is best when you actually have a camera and have used the 18-55mm. Then you see which ranges you need, and if you would benefit from something longer. The best all around lenses are 18-105mm and 16-85mm, while for telephoto 55-200mm is my favorite. Avoiding third-party brands is what most people do, but you can sometimes get a great lens for less cash. Below $1000, I rather stick to the brand that I use, plus your D3100 has no AF motor built in so not all lenses will focus.
For other lenses, 40mm f/2.8 Macro and 50mm f/1.8G would be brilliant, but you’d have to see what matters more to you. Shooting low light, portraits and everyday stuff = 50mm. Macro, portraits and products = 40mm. Seriously you will know better when you start using the camera
Hope I helped, good luck!
12/11/2011 at 4:41 PM
Even without a Camera in my hands this helps a ton. When it comes down to the T2i vs. the d3100, in an unbiassed opinion (if that’s possible) what would you pick? I’m sure this is hard because I’m sure you already have haha! Does the t2i have the AF motor in it, not just in the lenses? Is this a feature that is better than the extra points? I don’t necessarily care about video so that doesn’t really play into any of my decisions. Will 3.7 make a huge impact compared to 3.0?
12/11/2011 at 5:06 PM
T2i has the AF motor which means all lenses made for it will auto focus. 0.7fps isn’t really that much of a difference. Both have something better than the other, but I still recommend you to go with the D3100. If you would do video, then the microphone jack and 60fps in HD would be helpful.
Don’t worry about lenses with the D3100, there are many out that will fully work, as long as they have AF-S in their name.
12/13/2011 at 12:22 AM
Chio,
I really appreciate the help from you! One last follow up question. I know this is a hard question to answer because it is really based upon the eye/photographer, but being that I will be traveling, what would you recommend for the lens to bring? I am leaning towards getting a prime lens because everyone I have spoken with, not to mention, your article, recommend them. I just don’t know if you’d recommend a 55mm-200mm for travel purposes. I want to get that lens for being at a sporting event and having to be not be on the ice with the players, but I’m just at a huge fork in the road for my trips in the spring. The excitement to get the camera and start shooting is beyond words that I could ever put here.
Again, thank you for the help!
Ben
12/13/2011 at 9:36 AM
Hey,
So, you’re not sure if you would rather buy a prime lens or a zoom lens? A prime would be used for all around (around 35 or 50mm), while the telephoto would be used for sports and far away things? If so, trust me, almost every photographer sometimes doesn’t know which lens they should go with, even though they are for completely different purposes.
It is indeed hard to answer, but it matters what you prefer more. I don’t know how often you shoot hockey; if just once in a while and nothing professionally yet, then a prime lens would be great, I know I would get it. Traveling to me is much more important. As I have said before you’re gonna have to get a camera first, then quickly see what you need. I wish I could help you more but it’s something you got to decide on your own, what matters more for you and which lens would benefit you sooner.
12/12/2011 at 9:15 PM
hey! i am a beginner photographer.I’m confuse on which dslr camera should i buy because i doesn’t have an experience on this DSLR.. so, can some one help me?
i decided to buy it on may 2012.
12/12/2011 at 10:00 PM
By May 2012, there will be a few more DSLR cameras, especially in the beginner range. It highly depends on your budget and what you are looking for, as all DSLRs today are great. 1100D is what I recommend to those who want something cheap and good, and D3100 if you’re willing to spend a bit more to get some extra performance.
12/14/2011 at 12:06 PM
Hi Chio-TDP, I read all you recommendations about the DSLR for beginners, and would like to thank you for all the efforts in writing this.
Since I am planning to buy my first DSLR I would like to ask you about your opinion for these two cameras – Nikon D3100 and Sony Alpha SLT-a35.
At first I was ready to buy Nikon but the guy in the shop told me that the Sony A35 is better for this price, have an AF and more MP.
Mainly I will shoot landscapes, pets, also in low light.
Please advise me which one is better for absolute beginner.
Thanks a lot in advance!
12/14/2011 at 1:09 PM
I wouldn’t buy older cameras from Sony, only a65, a77 and whatever’s coming. Canon and Nikon have been into SLR and DSLR photography for a longer time, and so I would recommend you to get the d3100. The a35 has 2 more megapixels, which makes no difference at all. Any DSLR will be capable of doing what you have said, just make sure you learn and buy lenses later, instead of new cameras. D3100 doesn’t have an AF motor, but it’s not a problem, you simply buy lenses that have one inside. There are many available today and they are cheap as well, like the 55-200mm, 50mm f/1.8G, 35mm f/1.8G etc. Don’t worry about that
12/14/2011 at 2:28 PM
Hm, yes sounds great, but the point is that I don’t plan to buy additional lenses or at least not so soon.
So the lack of AF in Nikon D3100, when I use it with the standard lenses 18-55, what trouble may cause me? I mean do I need to focus manually all the time and the pictures will seem blurred often? Thanks again a lot
12/14/2011 at 3:11 PM
Well then you even have to worry less. Nikon wouldn’t give the 18-55mm without an AF motor, that would hurt their sales
It will work perfectly, and your camera will auto focus just fine and your images will look normal. You can still focus manually of course, like with every other lens.
12/14/2011 at 4:01 PM
Thanks Chio
Nikon will be my choice then 
12/14/2011 at 3:24 PM
oh god.when i turn out the live mode in the lcd screen and when it shows the setting mode screen lcd(i don’t what it is called)..it showed total blank/dark screen and wfter few seconds then it showed the setting screen ..I am scared what is it! is it a problem ??
12/14/2011 at 3:43 PM
What mode were you on? It’s probably because your shutter speed is too fast. Don’t worry, nothing is wrong, if you can see your pictures after you take them by looking through the viewfinder, everything else works too.
12/14/2011 at 8:20 PM
Hi,
I am planning to buy a DSLR camera. Have always been passionate about photography, and taking the first step towards time.
I went through Canon/Nikon entry level DSLRs and have zeroed down to the following three cameras:
1. Nikon D3100(18-55mm IS) – Worth $550
2. Canon EOS 1100(18-55mm II IS) – Worth $565
3. Canon EOS 1100(18-55mm II IS + 55-255mm II IS) – Worth $714
I want to capture indoor and outdoor both.
Basically I wish to do macro, nature (animals, flowers, buildings etc) and portrait photography.
Also I am NOT so inclined towards making videos using these cameras.
Can anyone suggest the best camera for me out of these three options?
12/14/2011 at 8:50 PM
Hey,
You say you wish to do indoors. How “professionally” do you mean, like action, or just simple portraits of friends and family? Both of these cameras have great high ISO performance compared to the previous generation, but the D3100 gives you one stop higher maximum ISO with slightly less noise. It can be very helpful to shoot with one stop faster shutter speed in certain situations.
Other than that, the D3100 has 2 more auto focus points, a slightly larger LCD screen and that would be it. Personally I would go with the first option then buy a macro lens (the 40mm f/2.8). However, if you will first want to shoot low light and portraits, then the 50mm f/1.8G might be better. But you have time to think about it once you purchase the camera and see how it works like.
So the D3100 it is, especially if it really is $10 cheaper than the 1100D.
12/15/2011 at 9:05 AM
Thanks alot for your suggestion.
But what about buying a combo kit of Canon EOS 1100(18-55mm II IS + 55-255mm II IS) – Worth $714.
I have doubt between Canon EOS 1100(18-55mm II IS + 55-255mm II IS) & Nikon D3100(18-55mm IS) because of following two reasons:
1. When I tried to take a macro shot I had to literally go close to the object and click. But with a 55-255mm II IS lens, i could zoom far better(that is what I felt).
2. The image of Nikon as I heard is good for portrait pics and even the color of Nikon captures are not same as the actual color. While Canon gives true color. I read about this demerit of Nikon at several web sites. Need your suggestion on this too.
3. If I purchase a double kit of Canon which is being offered currently, Canon EOS 1100(18-55mm II IS + 55-255mm II IS) Worth $714, will that dual lens pack get me better pictures compared to Nikon D3100? Also buying a 55-255mm II IS lens later will cost me $300 while in the dual lens pack from canon I will get it buy paying just $170 extra.
This purchase plan is making me crazy. Relying on replies from you and keeping fingers crossed
12/15/2011 at 10:17 AM
Hey,
There, you are already talking about the mistakes that most beginners today do. But you can’t be blamed, you read something online several times and you trust it. Like that Nikon has better colors, or that Canon is sharper. Whoever says something like that doesn’t have any clue about DSLR cameras, and the fact that no one could tell if a shot was taken with Canon EOS 1100D or Nikon D700. If the photographer is bad, nothing will make images good. Plus, you can change the contrast and colors in the camera
More zoom did allow you to get closer, but that’s not macro. Macro is a magnification of 1:1, meaning that the real life object is just as big on your photograph. Telephoto zoom just gets closer, but yeah it’s better than nothing. You didn’t feel wrong, you did zoom more because it ends at a higher number. 10mm is wider than 50mm, and 250mm is longer than 55mm. The higher the number the more you can zoom.
No kit will get you better pictures, it depends on what you can make from it. Especially because these two are the cheapest cameras.
Since you put it that way then I guess you should go with the 1100D. It’s still a great camera, you get a little bit less stuff, but at least you pay less. Interesting prices you have there though, if it’s from US then you are buying somewhere very expensive, 55-250mm costs $200 maximum.
1100D + 18-55mm + 55-250mm = great kit for almost everything. So good luck, if you got any questions ask again
01/03/2012 at 8:40 PM
hello.
I am stuck… have many cameras, just none do the trick. We have a speedy little blur of a 16 mnt old girl, who has the most beautiful expressions – yet none of the cameras I have will capture them. I guess, I DO have an OLD SLR Nikon N65, and am partial to the feel of the Nikon, yet my cousin has the Rebel T3i, and it seems to take such great pics.
She does complain though, unless she uses the right lens, the photos can blur. I don’t have more than 800 to spend on lens/camera, and will need capability for some distance shots too, as my oldest is 15 and plays football.
So, best choice for digital SLR – least blur indoors with crazy moving people? I would also like to use for scenic and macro at some point…I especially love closeups of my little monster.
Is the T3i a best choice? I think I might be getting wooed by the fanciness of it and “new”ness… I hate to buy something that will be obsolete soon – since it will likely need to last me 10 years as the Nikon SLR did. Just can’t justify buying 35mm film and processing it anymore. 
Thank u so much!! I really love your site!!
01/04/2012 at 10:09 AM
Hey there,
Well the T3i takes great pictures because your cousin knows how to operate with it
Don’t worry, all DSLRs today are great and if you have ever used the manual mode on your N65 you should be fine. If not, there’s the manual, internet and libraries, we all had to learn it.
Yes, sometimes your shots will be blurred because your shutter speed will be too slow. You need to let in more light, that’s when you either open the aperture and/or increase the ISO speed. T3i performs very well for a beginner camera, and the aperture opening depends on the lens.
I think you should get the Canon Rebel T2i, same sensor and performance as the T3i, just no articulating screen, yet $100 cheaper. I recommend you to check out my article “Buying a Lens“. Macro lenses start at around $400, whereas the Canon 50mm f/1.8 (an excellent prime for low light and portraits) is $120 and has great quality. Nikon has the D3100 as T2i’s comeptition, but it doesn’t have an AF motor built in and is pretty much the same camera.
Good luck, ask if you need anything else
01/15/2012 at 9:40 PM
Hi.
I’ve been reading your reviews and suggestions on the D3100 and EOS1100. I’m leaning toward the D3100, but price is also important. My biggest problem is that I foresee never using the video feature. Have I chosen the wrong cameras to pick from?
I will be photographing landscapes, nature, architecture and typical vacation photos. Of course, I’ll also be taking pictures of my grandchildren.
Thanks for any help you can offer.
01/16/2012 at 1:14 PM
Hey,
Besides better video features, D3100 gives you one stop higher max ISO, less noise, 2 more auto focus points and 2 more megapixels. If you’re going to photograph action in low light, then that will help tremendously. However, if you really don’t want to spend so much then the 1100D will give you the exact same quality and you can use it for pretty much everything. I’d go with the D3100 though.
01/16/2012 at 3:20 PM
hi ,
chio-tdp , your suggestions are excellent , please tell me nikon d3100 or nikon d 5100 which one is better ? please also tell me which camera is excellent for beat quality results in very low light and rough use also , thank you !
01/18/2012 at 12:38 PM
Hey,
D5100 has one stop higher max ISO, slightly less noise, 4 vs 3fps, bigger body and an articulating screen. Both of these have the same quality, you are looking at the cheapest options (but that doesn’t mean they’re bad). For low light action, d5100 would allow you to shoot with one stop faster shutter speed (due to ISO range).
01/18/2012 at 12:22 PM
Hi, I was wondering what your opinion on a Canon EOS 1100D is for a beginner. I have a point and shoot camera right now and would like to upgrade to a DSLR. My budget is up to around $1000 and it is purely for a hobby. I am only young, but hope with practice will be a great photographer in years. I mostly would like to take macros (flowers, plants, bugs), shoot animals, people and landscapes (busy cities, but countryside as well) not many action shots though. What is ‘manual mode’ and does the Canon EOS 1100D have it? Is it important or should I be looking for something with it? Explain please? (: Are there any other flaws or pros I should know about?
Thank you so much in advance!
01/18/2012 at 12:41 PM
Hey there,
1100D is a good DSLR for beginners on a budget. Since you have $1000 to spend, I wouldn’t recommend it. Look at the T2i, it uses a better sensor with one stop higher max ISO and 6 more megapixels. It shoots Full HD vs HD video, has a slightly larger LCD screen and bigger body. It’s around $600, which is still very cheap.
The 18-55mm kit lens will be great for everyday stuff, while for macro you have to get a macro lens, there aren’t any modes that would magically magnify things (most beginners think like that
). Every DSLR has a manual mode, it’s one of the reasons why people want to buy them as you have full control over your camera and can change the settings as you wish.
Ask more if you’re confused!
01/18/2012 at 1:00 PM
Thanks for the quick reply c:
I read your review and it does sound quite perfect for what I’d use it for. Do you know what the battery would be like, time wise? I think I might go and get this one soon. What size SD would you reccommend? Any other tips, complaints etc.? Also, do you know any good macro lens? Is there a specific price range for the 18-55mm kit and a macro lens?
Thank you so much for your help, your site is incredibly helpful, I have learnt so much already!
01/19/2012 at 10:24 AM
The battery lasts for around 500 shots, which is normal for cameras at this price range. I recommend SD Class 10 if you’re going to record videos, and Class 6 and if you’re only buying it for photography (where you don’t need faster writing speeds as it only has 3.7fps).
The cheapest macro lens is 60mm f/2.8, it’s around $450. I have a Buying a Lens guide with more sections for lenses.
01/19/2012 at 11:52 AM
hi ,
nikon d3100 or T2i ,or any other camera , which will you recommended ? i need the best camera with a budget 600 usd , please help me , thank you !
01/19/2012 at 2:01 PM
I would go with the T2i, as the D3100 has no built in AF motor, but they both have the same quality, ISO performance and build size, so there’s not much to worry about.
01/20/2012 at 4:31 PM
Hi
I am a beginner. and going to purchase my first dslr. advise me which one will be best. d3100 or eos 600d or others. thank you
01/23/2012 at 10:12 AM
Hey, you’re comparing the wrong models.
600D competes with D5100
550D and 1100D compete with the D3100.
However if you really want to compare the two models, then 600D is a bit better, but not worth the extra price. 550D would be much better as it uses the same sensor, yet costs $100 less.
01/29/2012 at 11:12 AM
Hi,
i’m trying to get a dslr cam and just like others i am stuck with Nikon D 3100 and Canon 1100 D… as i searched the net.. all i could see was the fight between nikon and canon fans.. so really confused… and i am just a beginner so dont know much abt lenses and all.. i have less knowledge abt aperture iso and shutter speed. havent ever used a dslr.. read it from an article.. i need to get one b4 i can explore more..
though nikon provide more video facilities, live view with 3″ and MP … i am not interested in any of it. MP and live view doesn’t matter much except for manufactures.. the thing i was attracted to canon is its gr8 battery life.. 800 v/s 550 of nikon.. but i dont know whether it reduces its performance or smthing..
so what would you suggest for me before i go to a shop and experience both of them ???
01/29/2012 at 11:15 AM
and what about the zooming capacity of both the cams ?
02/01/2012 at 11:38 AM
Hey,
Most people recommend what they have, while fanboys recommend their stuff and talk bad about other products. Don’t listen to them, both brands are great.
Battery life of 1100D and D3100 are almost identical, the difference is not that big. D3100 has one stop higher ISO level and a larger LCD screen, with 2 more auto focus points. For me that would be enough to go with it and pay a bit more.
You can of course go to the store if you’re scared that they might be too small if you have big hands, but we all get used to the camera we operate for some time.
As for your other comment, zooming depends on the lens. I recommend you to read more about lenses before buying the camera!
02/01/2012 at 12:07 PM
thanku for ur response.. hm i went through your buying a lens article and its very informative. thank you.
i need a dslr cam for wildlife purposes..
but i cant afford any 70-300 or even the 18-105.
do you think 18-55 would b enough at least for the time being?? as i said i am interested in wildlife photography it needs a considerable amount of zoom. but i have a tight budget.
does these cameras have any inbuilt zoom rather than the lens ?
02/02/2012 at 1:50 AM
is tamron lens good ??? i cant afford a 70-300 nikon or even sigma i thikn.. so is tamron lens good ???
02/02/2012 at 12:52 PM
actually i need a lens with considerable zoom and quality.. after ll lens are lens right? tamron and nikon and sigma doesnt have that much differences do they ?
02/05/2012 at 9:21 AM
I don’t know the prices for Sigma and Tamron zooms you mentioned, because they differ in every country, but have you checked out the Canon 55-250mm? This is the cheapest telephoto Canon offers, and anything from a third-party brand this cheap will usually be quite bad.
02/02/2012 at 7:05 AM
Hi,
I found a few cameras on Craigslist that were more in my budget range(at least the prices they were selling them at were) and was wondering your opinions on them since I didn’t see them on your lists…
Also out of those 3 which do you think is the best one? They all come with a kit lens and a few other accesories!
*Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT
*Nikon D40
*Canon Rebel XTi
I will mostly be taking pictures of my daughter for online boutique modeling in our home and outdoors. So i mainly want a good picture quality as the pictures of her need to be of “professional quality”… (Without professional prices!
Lol)
Could you please help me out?!
Thank you!
Jessica
02/05/2012 at 9:18 AM
Hey,
You don’t see them here because they’re old, and won’t find them new.
All of these have good quality, and they’re pretty much the same thing as well. I would go for the XTi, if you learn how to use it in the manual mode you should be fine. If you’re going to shoot in low light (inside), you will probably have to use a flash or experiment with lights, and if possible, get some photo editing software, that way you can edit the shots if they’re not as good as they look on that little screen (a very common “problem” in bad lighting situations).
Good luck, these 3 are really the same thing
D40 has no AF motor so not all lenses will auto focus with it.
02/05/2012 at 11:45 PM
Ok thanks for the tips! I did end up getting the XTi! It’s perfect for me Lol
02/07/2012 at 7:19 PM
hey
i’m 16 and recently i’ve become really interested in photography. i’ve been using a pretty rubbish camera before and i am looking for a dslr. i’ve been saving up for a while now but my budget isn’t that high (around $500) one of my friends recommended the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2KK is this a good one to buy and if not which would you suggest?
thanks so much
kate
02/09/2012 at 1:27 PM
Hey,
That Panasonic is actually not a DSLR, even though it may look like one. If you want a real DSLR cheapest ones are Canon EOS XS, T3 and Nikon D3000, but if you’re looking for a very good compact camera with plenty of zoom then the only one I know is the Canon SX40 HS.
02/08/2012 at 5:02 AM
Thanks for the great info. I am going with the Nikon 3100 based on my needs and will use your link to Amazon lend support. I have been researching for weeks, finally making the commitment to buy thanks to your site.
02/09/2012 at 1:28 PM
Thanks a lot, if you need any help simply post a comment!
02/08/2012 at 9:07 AM
Hi,
Thanks for so much information on various cameras. I am in similar boat. Totally new to DSLR.
1. My friend is using Nikon with 18-55 and 55-200 lens set. He suggested to buy 18-200 to save efforts of changing lenses. Do you think it solves the purpose, considering cost of 18-200 lens is more than the body itself.
2. Since we get 18-55 as kit lens, why should one need to buy dedicated 50 mm lens. Cant’t 18-55 be used for same purpose. Sorry for silly question.
3. I had made up my mind for D5100, but since AF-S lens are costly, I am giving second thought for Cannon 550D (T2i). Please suggest if it is true. What additional features do one get with D5100 (considering I am new to photography).
4. What would be price diff between AF and AFS lens, considering all parameters are similar.
02/09/2012 at 1:32 PM
Hey,
1. An 18-200mm would solve it all, but it has worse quality because more zoom means more objects inside a lens, and that means worse performance.
2. That’s exactly what I was wondering when I first started out, and most people as well. As I said above, more glass means more problems. A prime lens that is only at 50mm has excellent performance, less optical problems, is lighter and also has a large aperture so you can shoot in low light or blur the background nicely.
3. AF-S lenses aren’t really that expensive, it just depends on where you look. Some Canon lenses with same focal lengths are more expensive too. The T2i is an amazing camera as well, but it competes with the D3100. Basically it doesn’t have an articulating screen, that’s all.
4. That’s very hard to answer, because the more expensive the non AF-S lens the more expensive AF-S version will be. Like 50mm f/1.8D and 50mm f/1.8G, the price difference is around $60, but for some $1000+ lenses it can be much more.
02/09/2012 at 6:27 PM
Hi Chio
Thanks for your valuable opinion. I love the way you understand everyone.
I wold like to confirm few points :
1. Out of D3100 and T2i…you have given equally good views for both. I visited a site with comparison : http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon_EOS_550D-vs-Nikon_D3100
Please validate the comparison and suggest if T2i gets more points.
2. On Prime Lens : 50mm f1/8
* Why 50 mm is most popular ?
* if we cant zoom, will it be a handcap at time, coz even point and shoot provides zoom (as I have used only point and shoot till now)
* Since f/1.8 is fixed, can we still change aperture through camera. If not does it mean all images will have similar background blur ?
Raj
02/09/2012 at 7:04 PM
Few more points in continuation :
3. Do cannon makes lots of noise while auto focus process ? Is it gets recorded during creating a movie ?
4. IS (image stabilisation) is a camera body feature or Lens feature. Do we get IS feature only in selective camera bodies / lenses or it is now a default feature.
Raj
02/09/2012 at 8:54 PM
3. No, not at all. In fact Canon has an USM, Ultra Sonic Motor, that makes auto focus quiet and fast. Nikon (AF-S), Sigma (HSM) and other brands have it too. If the lens you want doesn’t have USM, then it will just be a bit louder, some more some less. While recording a movie, some can be quiet noisy, but 18-55mm should be alright. One of the noisiest are 50mm f/1.8 and 35mm f/2.0
4. With Canon and Nikon, IS depends on the lens, which is better in my opinion as they can make it specific for each lens.
IF you need more help just ask!
02/09/2012 at 8:51 PM
Hey,
I usually don’t recommend such sites because they make you believe that one camera is actually ten times better, when it just has an extra feature. I would always go with the T2i, as it has a built in AF motor, better video and a better body. Image quality and noise are the same!
2. In the old days when film was 24 x 36 (today Full Frame sensors), 50mm used to be the lens that you could use for everything. Even today on APS-C/DX (1.6x multiplier), it’s still great for all around stuff. I use my 50mm f/1.4 for portraits, concerts, trips and everything else. We all get used to having no zoom, and it’s actually even better if you know what you will shoot. It won’t be a handicap because DSLRs have zooms, and if possible you just bring both. However, once you understand the focal lengths you will usually just bring one lens and it’ll be enough!
f/1.8 is not fixed, it’s just the largest available aperture
That’s huge compared to what the majority of zooms do (like f/4, that’s 2 and a half stops smaller). The larger the aperture, the more light comes in and more blurred your background appears.
02/10/2012 at 3:57 AM
Hi,
Now getting excited to have deep dive in DSLR world. Thanks to you.
Understanding lenses and buying right lenses is quite challenging.
1. With reference to IS, IS II and USM, which would e perfect prime lens for portrait and regular outdoor shoots. I saw reviews of Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM which had good reviews on amazon as best portrait lens, but it is not IS.
Please have your inputs on this.
2. Are regular kit lenses of cannon USM and IS ? Should I purchase only body of T2i and prime lens (with USM and IS) separately, moving to variable lenses later ?
3. If Cannon USM is to be considered, which ofcourse would be expensive compare of normal, then why not to get nikon 3100 with AF-S lenses. If you remember, my idea behind taking cannon was to avoid expensive AF-S lenses.
I am confused on variety of lenses and technology.
Suggest bro.
02/10/2012 at 10:47 AM
Hey,
1. The longer the lens, the better it is to have IS, as any unwanted movement will be easily seen. There’s a rule to use the shutter speed that’s higher than your lens, so at least 1/50 with a 50mm lens and so on. I use the 50mm f/1.4 USM and there’s no need for IS on it because of its large aperture and fairly short focal length. With 85mm, you have to be more stabilized.
You could also get a 50mm f/1.8 for around $120.
2. No, 18-55mm has no USM, just IS. Starting with a prime lens isn’t a bad idea, but most beginners benefit a lot from zooms when they start out, as they see what they really need.
3. Exactly, some Canon lenses are cheaper, and some not. You could totally get the D3100 and continue with AF-S, but as I said I would personally go with the T2i as it has a built in AF motor and you have more lens options. But Nikon is absolutely the same in quality and performance, so it comes down to a feature that you prefer on one camera.
I understand you’re confused, it’s easy to get lost here
02/10/2012 at 10:54 AM
Thank you so much for your response. Chio, you are simply great. I will come back for more queries later.
02/17/2012 at 4:49 AM
Hi Chio,
What are your opinion on Bridge camera from Cannon – PowerShot SX30 IS.
Apart from option to change lens, do we get more clarity in images from DSLR. I was wondering these hi end bridge cameras would be able to provide equally good images. Moreover we also get option for manual settings.
Please suggest.
Raj
02/17/2012 at 12:38 PM
My first serious camera was a bridge from Sony, and it was great. I know Canon makes good ones too, but compared to DSLRs their image quality is worse and they have more noise, as the sensor is smaller. Keep in mind worse doesn’t mean bad, it’s just that DSLRs give you more for the price.
Even a $1000 P&S with a tiny sensor in this age couldn’t beat a $500 DSLR. The manual settings are nice but it’s often a hassle to change them. It’s up to you what you want; if you think one camera with a lot of zoom, video with AF, usable LCD screen to take pics and light body matters more than overall better image quality, faster AF and being able to switch lenses, get the SX30IS or something similar.
If possible go to a store and spend some time with both cameras. P&S’s are usually for people who take pictures of everything but don’t want to carry weight or mess with the controls.
02/18/2012 at 9:43 AM
I quote to my friends that using DSLR is very amazing experience.I hardly use my P&S cam.I take P&S ,not my DSLR, whenever my friends are gathering because most of the time they ask to borrow LOL.and they don’t give a d to the P&S cam and that is a relief. hahaha..
Chio has helped me choosing the right camera.And I always remember him when selecting the tools/equipment.
02/19/2012 at 6:28 PM
HI Chio,
My frined is having Canon 60 D with 55-250 Lens. Recently he has purchased 100-400L and wants to sell 55-250 lens.
1. Can 550D support 55-250 Lens ?
2. Although he takes good care of his lenses, how can once make sure these are not having any problems ?
3. Is used 55-250 Lens a good buy at approx USD 60?
Raj
02/19/2012 at 7:23 PM
Yes, 550D fully works with EF and EF-S lenses, which means all Canon lenses for DSLRs will work with it. The 55-250mm is an excellent lens for the price, and $60 is around 4x lower than new, so that’s good.
You should try it first if you two didn’t talk about it yet. Check the auto focus speed by focusing on something near then far, in very quick maneuvers. Check for scratches and look if there’s a filter on the lens. If it’s been on since he bought that that’s great, if not then hope the front element is not scratched and definitely get your own filter later (~$20).
02/22/2012 at 5:17 AM
Hi Chio,
Yesterday I bought Cannon 550D with 18-55 IS II kit lens. Thanks a lot for your valuable tip and suggestions. I am too happy to get my new camera and images are coming amazing.
Thanks a ton….
Raj
03/04/2012 at 7:42 PM
Hi Chio,
Shooting with New 550D is fun. Receltly I shot my daughter’s birthday. During taking quick snaps, I notices “BUSY’ message on screen and no function works. I am using class 10 16 GB card. Please suggest.
Raj
03/04/2012 at 9:00 PM
If you were using the built-in flash, that’s quite common as it needs to recharge and the more you use it the more it takes. Can be bad in certain situations, but there’s nothing you can’t do about it.
If there was no flash then it could be a bad card, but unless it worked well at other shoots then I honestly don’t have an idea.
03/04/2012 at 10:18 PM
I am really confused what dslr to buy.,either canon 500D or nikon D3100.,both are good in some reviews i had read…i am a beginner.,and i wanted to seek advice from you Chio.,this is my first time to buy a camera.,and i wanted to be really worth it…hope you can give a piece of your advice me. Because i saw that the canon D500 has a higher megapixel of 15.1 compared to nikon D3100 14.2mp .,so much confused…..
03/05/2012 at 3:00 PM
some shots from 550D if anyone want to see what it can.
http://www.pixoto.com/images-photography/fine-art/things/nepal-kathmandu-nepalgunj-satyam-18838986
03/05/2012 at 3:28 PM
Does it make any noticeable differences in images with slightly larger sensor (Nikon 23.6 x 15.6mm vs Canon 22.3 x 14.9mm )?
03/06/2012 at 12:01 PM
No, that’s a minor difference, but if these are the T2i and D5100, then the Nikon one has slightly better high ISO performance.
03/06/2012 at 12:02 PM
Those shots look brilliant, you’ve improved a lot in a short time
!
03/06/2012 at 3:57 PM
thank you Chio.I esp. wanted to share the images with you.I hope I’mn’t spamming this page with my image links.
!I am happy to share with you my friend.
03/09/2012 at 6:18 PM
Chio, can you suggest me which deal is good among these?
1. Canon EOS 1100D SLR (Black) with Kit (EF S18-55 III) —>>> $543
2. Canon EOS 1100D SLR (Black) with Kit (EF S18-55 IS II) —>>> $581.8
3. Nikon D3100 SLR (Black) with ( AF-S 18-55mm VR Kit Lens) —>>> $658
I am beginner and wanted to do photography so that i can contribute myself in art work. And my budget is less and its around $555. Please, suggest me one camera. Also give the differences between EF S18-55 III, EF S18-55 IS II lens.
Thank you.
03/10/2012 at 6:38 AM
If your budget is $555, then you can’t get the D3100 right?
Anyways, get the 18-55mm IS model as it comes with Image Stabilization which helps at getting clearer shots when you are in low light situations (but it wont freeze action, it’s only for still objects).
These two cameras are very similar though the D3100 comes with a little bit more bang for the buck, like Full HD, 2 more AF points, but quality wise it’s the same.
03/10/2012 at 8:30 PM
Hi Chio,
Please do let me know whether Olympus EPL1 is fine to buy, it is the cheapest dslr. how does it differ from Nikon D3100?
Also I have heard, the canon camera will go with all kind of lens (third party) easily, but Nikon does not…?
Does Olympus EPL1 is compatible for different kind of lens (third party).
Please advice….
03/12/2012 at 8:44 AM
Olympus stopped with real DSLR cameras a few years ago, these EPL models are mirrorless and that’s not how we define a DSLR. The D3100 is much better, but it’s bigger and weighs more, like all other DSLRs compared to mirrorless models.
Canon’s APS-C models can go with all EF and EF-S lenses, their Full Frame models accept EF only.
Nikon’s APS-C models can accept almost all Nikon lenses, but cheaper cameras don’t have an AF motor built in so really old lenses, or ones without an AF motor, will not auto focus! For example, 50mm f/1.8D will not auto focus on the D3100 as the camera has no AF motor built in. It will focus on D90 and higher models. I recommend you to read my Buying a Lens guide.
But anyways, the D3100 would be a great buy and there are many lenses that fully work with it. Canon’s competitor is the T2i, also good!
03/12/2012 at 6:43 PM
Hi Chio, Thank you so much.
But Nikon lens are costly right? Canon lens are comparatively cheaper right.? Can we buy Nikon D3100 and buy lens and get good results…? What are the draw backs of Nikon D3100.
For landscape and out door, Some say Canon is better and lens compatibility is easy. I am confused… need some more help… please help me…
03/13/2012 at 10:25 AM
Nope, Nikon lenses aren’t costly, it depends on what you compare. Both brands have something cheap and expensive. Of course you can buy a D3100 and get good results, Nikon wouldn’t release a $600 camera that would be horrible
There aren’t really any drawbacks with today’s DSLRs, it’s more what you don’t know yet that holds you back. The camera will be excellent for everything.
Those who say Canon is better for outdoors are beginners and have a lot to learn about photography. You buy a DSLR, Canon or Nikon, and start shooting. Some people unfortunately worry too much about their gear and think that the other brand will make their pictures sharper or nicer; it’s false.
Get the D3100 with the kit lens and go practice. It couldn’t be more simple today
03/12/2012 at 6:31 PM
hi there,
Just bought Nikon D3100. i dont carry a deep knowledge abt photography but i do love to take photos. as i am a beginer would like to understand my camera and learn photography. Could you please help me with some good websites which helps to do the same…..
Regards
Prashanth
03/13/2012 at 10:22 AM
Take a look at Digital Photography School, Dpreview and DigitalRev (on youtube). I don’t follow that many but these are very famous!
03/14/2012 at 8:36 PM
Like others I am comparing the Nikon D3100 and Cannon T3. Some things I read make me want to go one way, then something else says go the other.
A little background. This will be my first DSLR camera. I like taking pictures on vacation both inside and outside, Our newest and future vacations will be traveling and cruises as we have found that to be amazing vacations. I also photograph and video my daughter and her competitive cheerleading teams routine at competitions. I only have one more year of cheerleading to photograph (I usually only video once or twice a season the rest of the time I take pictures, so I will take more pictures than video.) It is a very fast paced action shots. I currently have an Olympus, I use it in the sports mode and most of my shots are clear usually. I do not really know the model but its 7mp so either will be a big upgrade. Often I have to stablize my arms as my hands have a slight tremor.
One of my biggest question lies with the AF motor in the camera or the lens? and the noise? Which is better? During my videos how much will it be heard? THe videos I want to shoot usually have loud music, LOL, so will it be signifigant?
Thanks in advance.
03/15/2012 at 10:37 AM
Hey,
I prefer the D3100 over T3, and have almost always recommended it. In your case, it’s the same;
D3100 offers one stop higher ISO speed, meaning you could shoot action in low light easier. Plus it has less noise at higher ISO speeds!
Second thing, D3100 has better frame options in video and has somewhat better AF while recording (keep in mind this is bad on all DSLRs for now). It also comes with a larger LCD screen and 2 more AF points (11 vs 9).
You will still have to stabilize yourself if you will shoot in low light, but it will be easier as you can control the shutter speed and everything else while in the Manual mode. Plus, if you will later buy a lens great for low light you most likely won’t even have such problems anymore.
D3100 has no AF motor built-in, so before buying any lenses make sure to check they have the term AF-S written, or there won’t be any focus. As I have mentioned above, AF in video is horrible and loud, but ironically the D3100 is the best so far. If the music will be loud it won’t be a problem, but you can always focus manually
So, get the D3100 and you won’t regret anything, but make sure to learn and practice. In the Auto mode your camera will not give you its all, so try to go Manual as soon as possible!
03/15/2012 at 3:55 PM
Hi,
I am currently considering to buy the canon rebel T3…however, I (well my dad) have bought a long time ago a lens (aspherical IF 18-200mm). I just wanted to know if it would be compatible with the canon T3. It’s a good lens and I have used it really little back in the past. I am not an expert with camera, so that is why I am seeking advise.
03/15/2012 at 8:25 PM
Unfortunately that doesn’t help a lot. Is the lens from Canon or Nikon? It sounds like a Nikon lens (based on “IF”), so you won’t be able to mount it on any Canon dSLR. The T3 is a good DSLR though, great for those on a budget that don’t expect it to shoot 10 frames per second.
03/25/2012 at 10:46 PM
For 50 us dollars more i can get a canon t2i over Nikon d3100 ur thoughts?
04/03/2012 at 4:46 PM
Yeah I would go with it, I prefer its video options and the AF motor, image and noise quality are the same.
04/07/2012 at 4:08 PM
Hi,
I’ve been wanting to buy my first DLSR for a while now, but the more I research the more I seem to change my mind. The two I am currently looking at is the Canon EOS 1100D and the slightly cheaper Nikon D3000.
Ideally I want the Nikon D3100 but I really can’t fork out the extra cash. Is it worth waiting for for D3100 price to drop? Is the Canon EOS 1100D worth the extra money in comparison to the D3000?
Thanks.
04/08/2012 at 8:12 AM
Well as far as I’m concerned, the D3200 could actually come in the next few months, which will definitely lower the price eventually. Whether you can wait or not, it’s up to you, even when the D3200 gets announced it will be at least a month before it comes.
But D3000 vs 1100D, definitely the Canon. Live view, video, better high ISO, less noise and an AF motor.
Good luck!
04/07/2012 at 4:31 PM
Hi,
I’ve read all the conversations above and it really is great to know. i am considering of getting my first new dslr as i want to start with photography for a lot of reasons. So even if I havent come across this article yet, I already am considering Nikon D3100.
Thanks for all the info shared and will be in touch for more
04/09/2012 at 11:25 AM
Hi,
I am ready for my first DSLR and have been looking at the D3100 and D5100 (however I am open to any other suggestions) I have two small children and will mostly be photographing trips to the zoo, Sea World, Disney on Ice, etc… My kids are constantly moving and I am sure they will start playing sports soon, so being able to capture that is very important to me. I know that the D5100 has slightly higher fps but is it enough to make a difference for someone like me who just want to photo a kid running down a soccer field? I am willing to spend the extra $$$ if the 5100 is better for me, but I don’t want to waste my $$$ on a bunch of features I don’t need. I am also wondering- Is buying a DSLR like buying a computer where I buy the newest model today and 2 years from now it is so outdated that I am having to upgrade or is this camera going to still be great 5 years from now? Thanks for your help!
04/10/2012 at 10:37 AM
Hey,
1 more fps is helpful, but definitely not worth the extra dollars alone. It has one stop higher ISO speed and that’s all that I personally find better and actually useful.
Have you seen the Canon T2i? The same as D3100, just comes with an AF motor, has 3.7 vs 3fps and same quality and performance.
You’ll see that your lens will matter more than the camera, especially if you plan on shooting lots of sports. The 18-55mm kit lens is fine for basic stuff, but for all around an 18-135mm would be better and for serious telephoto work (zoo, kids far away, sports), a 55-250mm or 70-300mm would be much better. All of these lenses are below $500, each.
And no, current DSLRs aren’t like computers, there is nothing to upgrade that would otherwise make your camera slower, and lots of people still use 5+ year old cameras for pro stuff. Most of my friends who shoot for newspapers and studios use such cameras, they already know it’s more about the lenses and your skills once you buy a DSLR!
So personally, I recommend the Canon T2i with 18-55mm, or body only with 18-135mm if you prefer a more all around lens, and then later a telephoto zoom.
04/14/2012 at 4:18 PM
Hi – I am looking to upgrade my point&shoot to a DSLR – of course my eyes are glazing over with the all reviews of the Canon T3 vs Nikon 3100…I have found that both are around the same price now…but also found a t2i for maybe another $100 more than these 2 basic dslr…one thing I saw re: the 3100 on amazon was that their was a ‘freezing’ problem…but from what I can gather that was due to certain settings that did not seem to apply to me
my main use will be small product photography – i.e. jewelry and other small fabric accessories – I do have a light box setup and would like to get a DSLR for this; I am also planning to do some video blog tutorials (things like how to solder small jewelry pieces, etc)…so I would like to get a camera that has some extra specs for that as well…
sicne the price difference between the Nikon 3100 vs Canon T2i is negligible ($100)…would one be recommended over the other…
also, is the macro setting on a point and shoot a totally different animal than the DSLR and would an extra lens be better for the small product photos for websites/show juries/applications?
Thanks!
04/16/2012 at 6:48 AM
You probably know this already, but let me tell it again: when there is something wrong with an electronic device, people will always post it. When it works well, only a few will write that
Don’t worry about that problem, there are tens of thousands of D3100 users and if something doesn’t work well, you return it back.
If you want to do macro photography (great for jewelry etc.), you need a macro lens. Macro function on any camera is just marketing, unfortunately too many believe that. Macro means that the glass magnifies the object, not that the lens just gets so close to it.
D3100 and T2i are very similar (same image, video quality, high ISO performance, features), if you can get the D3100 for $100 less, go with it! Then you get the 40mm f/2.8 Macro which is $280 and you can shoot it all.
04/16/2012 at 11:04 AM
Thanks so much for your help, yes when I look on amazon reviews at all 3 cameras the large majority of reviews are positive and a small % negative (1-2 stars) so to me that was a sign all 3 cameras were fine and I just needed to narrow down what I was using the camera for and most reviewers I found seem to focus on action shots, portraits, etc so I was feeling a bit lost and starting to wonder if I was buying over my needs
…the thing hanging me up was the things I want to do with the camera…I had put the T3 in my last choice of the cameras I mentioned due to what I thought I may need for video, but was hung up between the 3100 and the T2i
05/08/2012 at 6:41 PM
hello Chio-TDP
Thanks for your huge support for all of us who are new to these DSLRs.
I’m planing to buy a dslr in June(mid). I’m a student, of course I should start with I’m limited with a budget around 500$.
? ( I mean if you did like travel, macro, nature, portraits and No video snapping at all)
I have been practising photography using my compact digital camera for almost more than 2 years and now need to move into dslrs. I’m NOT into Video snapping AT ALL. I’m much more into, portrait, nature(landscapes, buildings and etc), animals(I mean macro) and Travel. And I’m a hobbyst, no need to be a professional though.
I’m attracted to Canon 450D, Nikon D3100, Canon 1100D, and Canon 500D. But I have to consider my budget too. Actually, I need to buy lens kit too remaining within the same budget. What I was thinking to buy is canon 450D, as it’s bit more advanced (as I understood and read in some guides) and has to offer more in a photographic edge than both of the other too. (specially it has live view, dust control, and dynamic range finder, and image cquality isn’t a huge deal here I guess, 2 more pixels wouldn’t make much difference). as I said, I’ll buy canon 450D and later with a little money (i can save) and will add little more and will buy a good lens which will let me shoot good photos. What do you think? is it a good idea? But definitely I’m going to upgrade myself to a little bit better advanced camera after 2,3 years.
But you said, nikon d3100 will be cheap after few months in an earlier post around may or June. So What do you think, still should I buy a nikon d3100 or canon 1100d or canon 450D? And I need a bit more to advanced side from the camera (even though all of them are entry level dslr cameras) I saw for still photography, 450D is better. So what do you think? I don’t want to know what you’ll do for yourself, as your interests aspects of photography could be different from mine. But I’d like to know what you’ll do if you were me
I hope you’ll help me to figure out what model I should buy and the special reasons to buy that model.
05/08/2012 at 6:48 PM
One more fact: I started to like 450D, mainly because it has most of the configurations(needed for good photographing) of Canon 500D which is similar with Nikon D5100 and Nikon D90 which is a great photographing camera. That’s why I liked it over nikon d3100.
05/09/2012 at 5:53 PM
Hey!
500D is the worst of all you mentioned, it has the most noise, weird video fps and is too expensive. D3100>450D>1100D.
So, budget wise, the 450D would be the best, and it was also my second DSLR camera and I loved it, I learned all that I know on it and there is nothing you could not shoot with it. Same goes for the D3100, which has 2 more AF points, 2 stops higher ISO with less noise and video. But the price difference is big, so unless the D3100′s price lowers a lot soon (D3200 was released), I say go for the 450D with the 18-55mm. The lens will be great for all around stuff and you will also learn the distances you need for your types of photography. For macro, you need a macro lens though!
I’m sure you are probably a bit worried about the 450D as it is an older model, and that something won’t be good, but if you buy it new it will be just as good as when it came out. All DSLRs are very similar, your skills and lenses matter more.
05/21/2012 at 10:36 AM
Hi,
I am trying to decide which of your suggested Nikon cameras I should purchase. For the past 5 years I have used a Sony Cybershot to take pictures of all my world travels, but lately it has been showing some wear and I have decided my travels would be documented well with a Nikon. One of my friends has a D70 from 2004 and I have tried her camera and loved it, so I want to know which of the two you would suggest.
Thank you
05/21/2012 at 8:14 PM
Hey,
Besides the obvious better image quality, noise performance and other things, you have to keep in mind these are bigger and heavier cameras. If the D70 seemed alright for you in terms of size, then you should be fine.
Skip the D3000, it’s old and I would only recommend the D3000 for someone on a super tight budget who doesn’t need much. D3100 is miles ahead, has newer technology that actually competes and beats the rest at the same price level, whereas the D3000 was just nothing special. At $549 at Amazon, it’s a steal.
Good luck!
06/04/2012 at 7:39 AM
Hi
I am thinking in buying the Nikon D3100 as I think is one of the best DSLR’s for beginners. Another reason is because I have 2 lenses from a F90. One is the Nikkor AF 35-80mm and the other is the AF 75-300mm. Do they really fit in the D3100 with no problems? Will I have some issues?
Thanks and congrats for the site
06/06/2012 at 5:17 AM
The only issues you will have is that they will not auto focus on your D3100, as it has no AF-S motor built in. They will fit and work, you will have to focus manually though, but the D3100 is a great decision even if you don’t have those two lenses!
06/04/2012 at 7:42 AM
Ups forgot to ask one more thing, how long does it take the power of the battery? Do you suggest to by a 2nd one?
Thanks again
06/06/2012 at 5:18 AM
If you are going to travel, or sometimes have a long day shoot, definitely get yourself an extra battery!
06/06/2012 at 5:42 AM
Hi
You said about the old lenses that “they will not auto focus”, will it be complicated to auto focus with them? or will just a take a bit more work each picture? What about the memory card? what’s the average of pictures with a 16gb camera? Indeed I am going to travel for 2 months and not sure if buy a second card.
Thanks for your advise
06/06/2012 at 6:33 AM
You mean if it will be complicated to manually* focus with them? At first probably, but then you will slowly get the hang of it. It’s much more difficult for moving subjects though..
Never buy a big card, it’s much better to buy two 8GB cards. If one fails, you still have the other one and shots left. Trust me, almost everyone’s card dies once, usually it’s right when you need it the most.
My 8GB stores around 1200 shots with an 18 megapixel camera. Yours (14MP) should have around 1600!
07/19/2012 at 12:34 PM
Hi again!!!
I finally bought the D3100…..just great!!! For what I needed was a great deal for 500E. The old lens work perfect although they need a special clean (images to foggy). The work with manual focus is ok after a round of pictures. The 8Gb card makes good the service as I could manage around 2200 pics in jpeg high resolution. I have also a 4Gb card what makes 3300 pictures. The battery worked for about 850 pictures including the first experience with the camera.
The camera itself is very handy use and very fast from off to on and shot and the images and colours are very natural. Good, good and good camera! D3100
Thanks for the advice
Cheers
06/19/2012 at 8:25 AM
06/18/2012 at 7:37 AM
Hi,
I am planning to buy DSLR and some one suggested Canon 550D. Now after reading this blog, I am confused. Though I agree, HD video recording is that what I would be paying for 550D, but still I am confused for not taking a higher model (being first timer SLR).
My primary need for SLR is capturing my new born girls moments.
Please suggest.
06/20/2012 at 4:40 AM
The 550D can do the same thing as any higher model; it just doesn’t offer as many features like 8fps…It’s a beginner model, with a great sensor, good low light performance, video is amazing and since you will be paying mostly for it, there’s no need in going with a higher model because they do the same thing.
More important will be your lens decision; 18-55mm at first but for portraits, low light and people, something like a 50mm f/1.8 would be great!
06/21/2012 at 8:40 AM
so shuld i buy D3100 does it have selective color?? effeect!! though i m a beginner so shuld go with D3100 and start learning !!
08/14/2012 at 6:39 AM
Hi Chio,
I am trying to decide between the cannon T3 and the nikon D3100. I am currently leaning towards the D3100 mainly because of all the facts you pointed out here, but I was reading another article (cant find the link right not) where they mentioned that the D3100 isnt capable of HDR. Well I want to ask what exactly is HDR, how big of a difference does it make, and does the T3 have HDR capabilities? Thanks!
08/26/2012 at 12:54 AM
Hi chio,
Great blog, very informative. I have been looking around to move to DSLR camera after long time ago SLR camera. Time to upgrade from digital pocket camera!! I was inclined for cannon DSLR, since I have always had cannon and from others friend have it. But from the blog above you indicate Nikkon D3100 is very good for price/performance compare to Cannon T2i.
I see this offer was wondering is it good offer, to “to take the plunge”? Main concern, Are the lens good quality range to cover most needs. Basically from lndoor ,low light, portrait, sports …. outside nature, sunset pictures, sometime wildlife shots.
Is offer to good to let go??
$649.99 after $250 OFF
Nikon
D3100 DSLR Camera
with
F-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR lens (3x Optical Zoom, Optical Image Stabilization)
AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR lens (Optical Image Stabilization)
Training Pack Bundle
Two Training DVDs
Case, 4GB SD Card
1080p Full HD Video
Scene Recognition System
08/29/2012 at 7:36 AM
Hey,
The T2i and D3100 are very similar but the price of the latter is too high right now.
Canon and Nikon both have lenses that can cover all of your needs, from $200 and up. With the kit 18-55mm lens you will be good for outdoor things and the 55-200mm is excellent for wildlife (not too far though) and sports. Keep in mind these are relatively cheap lenses, though for the price they are great.
Considering the D3100 with 18-55mm is $500 and the telephoto zoom is more than $200, this is a great buy although do not expect too much from those training DVDs. Also, the memory card could be some cheap slow model.